Difference between revisions of "May 10, 2012"
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
=Massive Map of Little Impact= | =Massive Map of Little Impact= | ||
+ | <!-- Start of content --> | ||
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:1:<h1> --> | <!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:1:<h1> --> | ||
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextLocalImageRule:15:<img src="/file/view/LPOD-Dec1-09.jpg/106228795/LPOD-Dec1-09.jpg" alt="" title="" /> -->[[File:LPOD-Dec1-09.jpg|LPOD-Dec1-09.jpg]]<!-- ws:end:WikiTextLocalImageRule:15 --><br /> | <!-- ws:start:WikiTextLocalImageRule:15:<img src="/file/view/LPOD-Dec1-09.jpg/106228795/LPOD-Dec1-09.jpg" alt="" title="" /> -->[[File:LPOD-Dec1-09.jpg|LPOD-Dec1-09.jpg]]<!-- ws:end:WikiTextLocalImageRule:15 --><br /> | ||
<em>map from Fauth's Mond Atlas, and image by Wes Higgins</em><br /> | <em>map from Fauth's Mond Atlas, and image by Wes Higgins</em><br /> | ||
− | <strong>Note:</strong> This is a reprint of the LPOD from [http://lpod. | + | <strong>Note:</strong> This is a reprint of the LPOD from [http://www2.lpod.org/wiki/December_1,_2009 Dec 1, 2009].<br /> |
<br /> | <br /> | ||
− | One of the hardest working and least appreciated lunar mappers was Phillip Fauth (1867-1941). In his early days he | + | One of the hardest working and least appreciated lunar mappers was Phillip Fauth (1867-1941). In his early days he |
− | inaugurated what he called a modern selenology, which focused on measurements and analysis of crater diameters, | + | inaugurated what he called a modern selenology, which focused on measurements and analysis of crater diameters, |
− | depths and slopes. He started a quantitative approach to lunar morphology studies which - after about 60 years of | + | depths and slopes. He started a quantitative approach to lunar morphology studies which - after about 60 years of |
− | inattention - finally caught on in the post-Apollo period. There are three reasons that Fauth was ignored. First, as shown | + | inattention - finally caught on in the post-Apollo period. There are three reasons that Fauth was ignored. First, as shown |
− | in his 1907 book <em>The Moon in Modern Astronomy</em>, he was boastful and nationalistic. Second, he became intimately | + | in his 1907 book <em>The Moon in Modern Astronomy</em>, he was boastful and nationalistic. Second, he became intimately |
− | associated with the crank, Hörbiger, who believed that the Moon and other worlds were covered in ice. But this full | + | associated with the crank, Hörbiger, who believed that the Moon and other worlds were covered in ice. But this full |
− | size copy of a small piece of his monumental 25 sheet map shows a more powerful reason for neglect: his cartography | + | size copy of a small piece of his monumental 25 sheet map shows a more powerful reason for neglect: his cartography |
− | was just too hard to interpret. Granted, no map looks good next to an image by Wes Higgins, but the pseudo contours | + | was just too hard to interpret. Granted, no map looks good next to an image by Wes Higgins, but the pseudo contours |
− | are confusing, with ups and downs being uncertain away from craters. I feel that shading needs to be added to give a | + | are confusing, with ups and downs being uncertain away from craters. I feel that shading needs to be added to give a |
− | three-dimension feeling to the contours. This map is like WIlkin's 300" [[September_15,_2008|map]] of roughly the same vintage. Both concentrate | + | three-dimension feeling to the contours. This map is like WIlkin's 300" [[September_15,_2008|map]] of roughly the same vintage. Both concentrate |
− | on details so much that legibility and interpretability become difficult. Fauth's large map was not completed when he | + | on details so much that legibility and interpretability become difficult. Fauth's large map was not completed when he |
− | died and his son finished it and brought it out in a nice edition in 1964. Fauth had always railed against photography, | + | died and his son finished it and brought it out in a nice edition in 1964. Fauth had always railed against photography, |
− | believing that a good trained eye could see more. But by 1964 the famous Mt WIlson photographs and then spacecraft | + | believing that a good trained eye could see more. But by 1964 the famous Mt WIlson photographs and then spacecraft |
− | images demonstrated that visual map makers would never catch up with photos, and his map was only of historic interest. | + | images demonstrated that visual map makers would never catch up with photos, and his map was only of historic interest. |
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<em>[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</em><br /> | <em>[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</em><br /> | ||
Line 29: | Line 30: | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<strong>Related Links</strong><br /> | <strong>Related Links</strong><br /> | ||
− | Rükl plate [ | + | Rükl plate [https://the-moon.us/wiki/R%C3%BCkl_44 44]<br /> |
[http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/full/seri/PA.../0015//0000452.000.html?high=49cfdc289912380 Review] of 1907 book.<br /> | [http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/full/seri/PA.../0015//0000452.000.html?high=49cfdc289912380 Review] of 1907 book.<br /> | ||
[http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1941C%26T....57..434D Obituary] (in French)<br /> | [http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1941C%26T....57..434D Obituary] (in French)<br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
− | <p><b>Yesterday's LPOD:</b> [[May | + | <p><b>Yesterday's LPOD:</b> [[May 8, 2012|Two Islands, Two Moons]] </p> |
<p><b>Tomorrow's LPOD:</b> [[May 11, 2012|High Waves or Low Faults On the Sea of Rainbows]] </p> | <p><b>Tomorrow's LPOD:</b> [[May 11, 2012|High Waves or Low Faults On the Sea of Rainbows]] </p> | ||
<hr /> | <hr /> | ||
Line 40: | Line 41: | ||
<td><!-- ws:start:WikiTextMediaRule:0:<img src="http://www.wikispaces.com/site/embedthumbnail/custom/4929871?h=0&w=0" class="WikiMedia WikiMediaCustom" id="wikitext@@media@@type=&quot;custom&quot; key=&quot;4929871&quot;" title="Custom Media"/> --><!-- ws:end:WikiTextMediaRule:0 --><br /> | <td><!-- ws:start:WikiTextMediaRule:0:<img src="http://www.wikispaces.com/site/embedthumbnail/custom/4929871?h=0&w=0" class="WikiMedia WikiMediaCustom" id="wikitext@@media@@type=&quot;custom&quot; key=&quot;4929871&quot;" title="Custom Media"/> --><!-- ws:end:WikiTextMediaRule:0 --><br /> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
+ | <!-- End of content --> | ||
{{wiki/ArticleFooter}} | {{wiki/ArticleFooter}} |
Latest revision as of 08:32, 28 October 2018
Massive Map of Little Impact
map from Fauth's Mond Atlas, and image by Wes Higgins
Note: This is a reprint of the LPOD from Dec 1, 2009.
One of the hardest working and least appreciated lunar mappers was Phillip Fauth (1867-1941). In his early days he
inaugurated what he called a modern selenology, which focused on measurements and analysis of crater diameters,
depths and slopes. He started a quantitative approach to lunar morphology studies which - after about 60 years of
inattention - finally caught on in the post-Apollo period. There are three reasons that Fauth was ignored. First, as shown
in his 1907 book The Moon in Modern Astronomy, he was boastful and nationalistic. Second, he became intimately
associated with the crank, Hörbiger, who believed that the Moon and other worlds were covered in ice. But this full
size copy of a small piece of his monumental 25 sheet map shows a more powerful reason for neglect: his cartography
was just too hard to interpret. Granted, no map looks good next to an image by Wes Higgins, but the pseudo contours
are confusing, with ups and downs being uncertain away from craters. I feel that shading needs to be added to give a
three-dimension feeling to the contours. This map is like WIlkin's 300" map of roughly the same vintage. Both concentrate
on details so much that legibility and interpretability become difficult. Fauth's large map was not completed when he
died and his son finished it and brought it out in a nice edition in 1964. Fauth had always railed against photography,
believing that a good trained eye could see more. But by 1964 the famous Mt WIlson photographs and then spacecraft
images demonstrated that visual map makers would never catch up with photos, and his map was only of historic interest.
Chuck Wood
Note: I've enjoyed researching Fauth's life online and rereading the Fauth chapter in the utterly wonderful Epic Moon by
Sheehan and Dobbins!
Technical Details
Wes' image details are here.
Related Links
Rükl plate 44
Review of 1907 book.
Obituary (in French)
Yesterday's LPOD: Two Islands, Two Moons
Tomorrow's LPOD: High Waves or Low Faults On the Sea of Rainbows
COMMENTS?
Register, Log in, and join in the comments.