Difference between revisions of "July 29, 2012"
| (9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
=A Steep Part To Climb= | =A Steep Part To Climb= | ||
| − | + | <!-- Start of content --> | |
| − | + | <!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:0:<h1> --> | |
| − | + | <!-- ws:start:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6:<img src="http://lpod.wikispaces.com/file/view/LPOD-Jul29-12.jpg/355213502/LPOD-Jul29-12.jpg" alt="" title="" /> -->[[File:LPOD-Jul29-12.jpg|LPOD-Jul29-12.jpg]]<!-- ws:end:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6 --><br /> | |
| − | <em>Apollo image AP15-M2611 from [http://lpod. | + | <em>Apollo image AP15-M2611 from [http://www2.lpod.org/wiki/May_24,_2009 ASU Apollo Browse Gallery] with 6 X vertical exaggeration cross-section from ASU's</em> <br /> |
<em>[http://target.lroc.asu.edu/da/qmap.html QuickMap] Path tool</em><br /> | <em>[http://target.lroc.asu.edu/da/qmap.html QuickMap] Path tool</em><br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
| − | The LRO QuickMap altimetry tool provides quantitative data on topography, and looking at oblique images gives a feel for it. | + | The LRO QuickMap altimetry tool provides quantitative data on topography, and looking at oblique images gives a feel for it. |
| − | This image is a small piece near the limb of an Apollo Metric Camera photograph taken when the Apollo 15 Command Module | + | This image is a small piece near the limb of an Apollo Metric Camera photograph taken when the Apollo 15 Command Module |
| − | was over the Aristarchus Plateau. The small image at upper right shows the perspective, looking across the northeast corner | + | was over the Aristarchus Plateau. The small image at upper right shows the perspective, looking across the northeast corner |
| − | of the Marius Hills to Marius itself. The most interesting features of the foreground are [http://lpod. | + | of the Marius Hills to Marius itself. The most interesting features of the foreground are [http://www2.lpod.org/wiki/May_24,_2009 two] sinuous rilles that differ in width, depth |
| − | and degree of sinuosity. The more conspicuous is the Marius Rille and the smaller one is less well known, but its tight curves | + | and degree of sinuosity. The more conspicuous is the Marius Rille and the smaller one is less well known, but its tight curves |
| − | bring to mind a description of a tightly meandering river on Earth: A river that doesn't know what to do with itself. My real interest | + | bring to mind a description of a tightly meandering river on Earth: A river that doesn't know what to do with itself. My real interest |
| − | is in the profiles of Marius. Looking at both the Apollo image and the topo cross-section we can see two parts of the rim deposits. | + | is in the profiles of Marius. Looking at both the Apollo image and the topo cross-section we can see two parts of the rim deposits. |
| − | On the left is a gentle rise in elevation of 500 m over a horizontal distance of about 10 km. And then right near the rim the slope | + | On the left is a gentle rise in elevation of 500 m over a horizontal distance of about 10 km. And then right near the rim the slope |
| − | changes abruptly, with a rise of ~200 m in less than 2 km. The rim on the right (west) side has only the gently sloping fallback | + | changes abruptly, with a rise of ~200 m in less than 2 km. The rim on the right (west) side has only the gently sloping fallback |
| − | deposits. I don't know what formed the steep segment of the rim. Rim elevations have two components - fallback and uplift due | + | deposits. I don't know what formed the steep segment of the rim. Rim elevations have two components - fallback and uplift due |
| − | to a sort of rebounding of the remaining country rocks when the material they were continuous with was instantly excavated and | + | to a sort of rebounding of the remaining country rocks when the material they were continuous with was instantly excavated and |
| − | removed. Is this narrow, steep section the rebound component? Finally, we should look carefully along the limbs of all obliques | + | removed. Is this narrow, steep section the rebound component? Finally, we should look carefully along the limbs of all obliques |
| − | Apollo images (and Kaguya's, too) for more profile views of craters and mountains.<br /> | + | Apollo images (and Kaguya's, too) for more profile views of craters and mountains. |
| + | <br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<em>[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</em><br /> | <em>[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</em><br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<strong>Related Links</strong><br /> | <strong>Related Links</strong><br /> | ||
| − | Rükl plate [ | + | Rükl plate [https://the-moon.us/wiki/R%C3%BCkl_18 18]<br /> |
<br /> | <br /> | ||
| + | <p><b>Yesterday's LPOD:</b> [[July 28, 2012|Just Make It Sing]] </p> | ||
| + | <p><b>Tomorrow's LPOD:</b> [[July 30, 2012|The X File]] </p> | ||
<hr /> | <hr /> | ||
| − | + | {{wiki/ArticleFooter}} | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 08:29, 28 October 2018
A Steep Part To Climb
Apollo image AP15-M2611 from ASU Apollo Browse Gallery with 6 X vertical exaggeration cross-section from ASU's
QuickMap Path tool
The LRO QuickMap altimetry tool provides quantitative data on topography, and looking at oblique images gives a feel for it.
This image is a small piece near the limb of an Apollo Metric Camera photograph taken when the Apollo 15 Command Module
was over the Aristarchus Plateau. The small image at upper right shows the perspective, looking across the northeast corner
of the Marius Hills to Marius itself. The most interesting features of the foreground are two sinuous rilles that differ in width, depth
and degree of sinuosity. The more conspicuous is the Marius Rille and the smaller one is less well known, but its tight curves
bring to mind a description of a tightly meandering river on Earth: A river that doesn't know what to do with itself. My real interest
is in the profiles of Marius. Looking at both the Apollo image and the topo cross-section we can see two parts of the rim deposits.
On the left is a gentle rise in elevation of 500 m over a horizontal distance of about 10 km. And then right near the rim the slope
changes abruptly, with a rise of ~200 m in less than 2 km. The rim on the right (west) side has only the gently sloping fallback
deposits. I don't know what formed the steep segment of the rim. Rim elevations have two components - fallback and uplift due
to a sort of rebounding of the remaining country rocks when the material they were continuous with was instantly excavated and
removed. Is this narrow, steep section the rebound component? Finally, we should look carefully along the limbs of all obliques
Apollo images (and Kaguya's, too) for more profile views of craters and mountains.
Chuck Wood
Related Links
Rükl plate 18
Yesterday's LPOD: Just Make It Sing
Tomorrow's LPOD: The X File
COMMENTS?
Register, Log in, and join in the comments.
