Difference between revisions of "June 2, 2004"

From LPOD
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "__NOTOC__ =Gassendi= ---- ===COMMENTS?=== Click on this icon image:PostIcon.jpg at the upper right to post a comment.")
 
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
=Gassendi=
 
=Gassendi=
 
+
<!-- Start of content -->
 
+
<table width="640"  border="0" align="center" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="2">
 
+
<tr>
----
+
</tr>
===COMMENTS?===  
+
</table>
Click on this icon [[image:PostIcon.jpg]] at the upper right to post a comment.
+
<table width="640"  border="0" align="center" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="2">
 +
<tr>
 +
<td> 
 +
<div align="center">[[File:LPOD-2004-06-02.jpeg|LPOD-2004-06-02.jpeg]]
 +
</div></td>
 +
</tr>
 +
</table>
 +
<p class="main_sm" align="center">Image Credit: [mailto:john@jsussenbach.nl John Sussenbach] and [http://www.lpi.usra.edu/research/lunar_orbiter/ NASA Lunar Orbiter IV]</p>
 +
<table class="story" border="0" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" width="90%" cellpadding="10" align="center">
 +
<tr>
 +
<td><p class="Story" align="center"><span class="class"> <b>Gassendi</b></span></p>
 +
<p class="story" align="left">The advent of webcams and image compositing and enhancing software has given amateur astronomers with modest size instruments the ability to acquire lunar images that equal or surpass the very best professional images. Now amateurs are pushing up against the resolution of space craft imaging. In this comparison of the lunar crater Gassendi, Dutch astroimager John Sussenbach notes that his image has a resolution of about 0.3 seconds of arc, which is both better than theoretical for an 11" and comparable with the Lunar Orbiter image. Gassendi (diameter 110 km) is another floor-fractured crater, like [[January_9,_2004|Posidonius]] and [[January_7,_2004|Petavius]]. The crater has been shallowed by floor uplift and lava flooding. </p>
 +
<p class="story" align="left"><span class="class"><i>Originally posted January 15, 2004 </i></span></p>
 +
<p class="story" align="left"><b>Related Links:</b><br>
 +
[http://www.jsussenbach.nl/ Sussenbach's Digital Astroimaging Using Webcam]<br>
 +
[http://www.scienceandyou.org/articles/ess_11.shtml Gassendi the scientist]            </p>
 +
<p><b>Yesterday's LPOD:</b> [[June 1, 2004|Posidonius: Rilles and Uplift]] </p>
 +
<p><b>Tomorrow's LPOD:</b> [[June 3, 2004|Lunar Ring]] </p>
 +
</tr>
 +
</table>
 +
<hr width="640" align="center">
 +
<p align="center" class="main_titles"><b>Author & Editor:</b><br>
 +
[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Charles A. Wood]</p>
 +
<!-- Cleanup of credits -->
 +
<!-- Cleanup of credits -->
 +
<!-- Cleanup of credits -->
 +
<!-- Cleanup of credits -->
 +
<!-- Cleanup of credits -->
 +
<!-- Cleanup of credits -->
 +
<!-- Cleanup of credits -->
 +
<p>&nbsp;</p>
 +
<!-- End of content -->
 +
{{wiki/ArticleFooter}}

Latest revision as of 11:22, 6 June 2015

Gassendi

LPOD-2004-06-02.jpeg

Image Credit: John Sussenbach and NASA Lunar Orbiter IV

Gassendi

The advent of webcams and image compositing and enhancing software has given amateur astronomers with modest size instruments the ability to acquire lunar images that equal or surpass the very best professional images. Now amateurs are pushing up against the resolution of space craft imaging. In this comparison of the lunar crater Gassendi, Dutch astroimager John Sussenbach notes that his image has a resolution of about 0.3 seconds of arc, which is both better than theoretical for an 11" and comparable with the Lunar Orbiter image. Gassendi (diameter 110 km) is another floor-fractured crater, like Posidonius and Petavius. The crater has been shallowed by floor uplift and lava flooding.

Originally posted January 15, 2004

Related Links:
Sussenbach's Digital Astroimaging Using Webcam
Gassendi the scientist

Yesterday's LPOD: Posidonius: Rilles and Uplift

Tomorrow's LPOD: Lunar Ring


Author & Editor:
Charles A. Wood

 


COMMENTS?

Register, Log in, and join in the comments.